J. M. Kubler
To Win
H. Grenier
To Win
Hugo Grenier vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W W L L W
Form
W W W L L W L L W WHead-To-Head: Grenier 2 - 1 Gigante
They have played 8 sets in total, with Grenier winning 4 and Gigante winning 4. The last match between Grenier and Gigante was at the Open 13 Provence - Marseille, 09-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Hugo Grenier getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hugo Grenier | 2 |
| Matteo Gigante | 1 |
Open 13 Provence - Marseille(09-02-2025)
3
6
6
3
6
3
| Grenier | Stats | Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (13-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 175 | Ranking | 195 |
| 95 | Highest Rank | 132 |
| 29 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 57% (421-314) | Career Total W/L | 58% (152-110) |
| $733,015 | Career Prize Money | $280,090 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Hugo Grenier
Player
Matteo Gigante
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Hugo Grenier
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
81)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 38 | Games Won | 36 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 18 |
| 1:52:1 | Average Match Time | 1:52:1 |
| 60% (144/240) | 1st Serve % | 56% (135/241) |
| 69% (100/144) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (94/135) |
| 40% (38/96) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (39/106) |
| 50% (14/28) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (14/28) |
| 45% (108/241) | Return Points Win % | 43% (102/240) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hugo Grenier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Li Tu
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
15
Aces
18
7
Double Faults
6
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
47 of
56)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
33 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
21 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Hugo Grenier
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
45%
(
28 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Bernard Tomic
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
8
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Christopher Eubanks
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
75%
(
24 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Hugo Grenier
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
35 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
18 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Jie Cui
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Mitchell Krueger
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (421/314) | Win/Loss | 58% (152/110) |
| 56% (961/760) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (344/270) |
| 52% (8570/7861) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3014/2765) |
| 65% (233/123) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (56/23) |
| 42% (54/74) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (84/60) |
| 54% (126/108) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26% (9/25) |
| 47% (8/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 3773 | Aces Total | 819 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2004 | Total Double Faults | 869 |
| 1:30:14 | Average Match Time | 1:33:21 |
| 466.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 353.52 |
| 64% (28495/44662) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10304/17390) |
| 71% (20247/28495) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (7019/10304) |
| 48% (7692/16166) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3499/7086) |
| 41% (1828/4454) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (825/1886) |
| 39% (18046/45881) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7284/17674) |
| 49% (17/18) | Slam W/L | 53% (9/8) |
| 53% (9/8) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (16/25) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (183/161) | Challenger W/L | 57% (100/75) |
| 66% (196/102) | Futures W/L | 73% (37/14) |
| 58% (409/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (149/254) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 52% (125/240) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (44/77) |
| 53% (125/238) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/88) |
| 84% (413/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (159/127) |
| 16% (413/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (159/30) |
| 23% (322/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (103/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
